投稿指南
一、本刊要求作者有严谨的学风和朴实的文风,提倡互相尊重和自由讨论。凡采用他人学说,必须加注说明。 二、不要超过10000字为宜,精粹的短篇,尤为欢迎。 三、请作者将稿件(用WORD格式)发送到下面给出的征文信箱中。 四、凡来稿请作者自留底稿,恕不退稿。 五、为规范排版,请作者在上传修改稿时严格按以下要求: 1.论文要求有题名、摘要、关键词、作者姓名、作者工作单位(名称,省市邮编)等内容一份。 2.基金项目和作者简介按下列格式: 基金项目:项目名称(编号) 作者简介:姓名(出生年-),性别,民族(汉族可省略),籍贯,职称,学位,研究方向。 3.文章一般有引言部分和正文部分,正文部分用阿拉伯数字分级编号法,一般用两级。插图下方应注明图序和图名。表格应采用三线表,表格上方应注明表序和表名。 4.参考文献列出的一般应限于作者直接阅读过的、最主要的、发表在正式出版物上的文献。其他相关注释可用脚注在当页标注。参考文献的著录应执行国家标准GB7714-87的规定,采用顺序编码制。

2021年2月28日托福独立写作真题范文 | 如何了解应

来源:试题与研究 【在线投稿】 栏目:综合新闻 时间:2021-03-04 08:49
作者:网站采编
关键词:
摘要:2021年2月28日? 托福独立写作 【考场题目回忆】: Nowadays many job interviewers and employers are looking for various additional sources of information to better understand a job applicant. Which is the best way for the?empl

2021年2月28日?

托福独立写作

【考场题目回忆】:

Nowadays many job interviewers and employers are looking for various additional sources of information to better understand a job applicant. Which is the best way for the?employers to better know the situation of a job applicant?

1. 询问候选人前雇主;Contacting previous employers the job applicant worked for and asking for further information;?

2. 查看候选人社交媒体和资料介绍;Checking the job applicant's profile on social platforms (such as social networking websites and social media)?;

3. 实习一个月; Letting the job applicant work for the company for a short period of time(1-month) and then decide whether to hire him permanently.?

Candidates'resumes cannot provide all the information employers need. Hence, to get a?thorough?understanding of the candidates, job interviewers and employers may turn to social platforms or their former employers for?reference checks. However, neither of the sources can offergenuine?and complete information. In fact, a short period of internship is the most desirable way to better know about the potential employees.?


● Thorough adj. 彻底的,完全的

●?Reference check 背景调查

●?Genuine adj. 真实的


During a job interview, asking personal questions, which is justifiable, may make candidates feel uncomfortable, not to mention the fact that it may be deemed as discriminatory. Checking out candidates'?social media presence?across all major platforms like Facebook or LinkedIn for answers can avoid such awkwardness, meanwhile?offering a better insight?into their skills and experience. However, are posts and profiles online completely truthful? The answer is surely negative. In fact, as such?information may reveal the candidates'?personal traits and their past performance, the dark sides of them like police records or irritable personalities are unlikely to be revealed. The worst case is that some shining points are?fabricated to trick their potential employers. If such insincere information is not detected, which is highly likely, the company hiring such candidates may eventually suffer great losses.?


● social media presence 社交媒体形象

●?offer an insight into 提供了解

●?personal trait 个人特质

●?fabricate v. 编造


Contacting former employers the candidates worked for is less undesirable, and there seems no reason for them to give untruthful information. Nevertheless, it is not unlikely that the information collected is incomplete. This is because former employers?are not obligated to?answer the reference check questions, nor should they be responsible for any inauthentic descriptions. In this case, when contacted, former employers may respond in an?offhand?manner, giving?bits and pieces?of information that is irrelevant or insignificant.?


● Be obligated to 有责任xxx

●?Offhand adj. 漫不经心的,不在乎的

●?Bits and pieces 零碎的


It thus follows that a short period of internship is the best way to find the best candidate for the job. After monitoring job applicants' progress, employers can know about everything about them including their intelligence, skills, ability to cope with stress, social skills and weaknesses. More importantly, with some actual works accomplished, employers cangauge?potential employees' abilities and prepare them for future works, in case they will be eventually?engaged. Not to mention, under close observation, candidates can hardly?fake?their performance and traits, and the information obtained is much more complete than the answers collected from previous employers.?


● Gauge v. 判断

●?Engage v.?雇用,吸引住,与… 建立密切联系

●?Fake v. 伪造


In conclusion, compared with social platforms and previous employers, an internship is the best way to know about job applicants.?



赢战新学期 开学见“分”晓 : />

文章来源:《试题与研究》 网址: http://www.styyjzz.cn/zonghexinwen/2021/0304/1110.html



上一篇:老外中文试卷“意外走红”,笑倒一片国人该尝尝
下一篇:男孩考试因题目太难崩溃大哭,看了看周围同学

试题与研究投稿 | 试题与研究编辑部| 试题与研究版面费 | 试题与研究论文发表 | 试题与研究最新目录
Copyright © 20019-2020 试题与研究 版权所有
投稿电话: 投稿邮箱: